We submitted our feedback using the link in the blog post, but we just discovered another potential blocker (relating to Forge resolver functions seemingly not working when type: "module" is specified in the main package.json file - see footnote below).
To @scott.dudley 's point about a private survey being a particularly bad way to gather this sort of feedback, what should we do if we wish to amend/append more feedback to our earlier submission? Submit another survey response?
Footnote:
We’re aware of the closed issue FRGE-1298, but this seems to still be a problem.
When type: "module" is specified, our resolver function errors with
There was an error invoking the function - forge_resolver__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0_ is not a constructor
When the type is removed (which defaults the project to CJS), the error no longer occurs.
Come on guys, it’s 2025. ESM is no longer new/experimental. Forge should not break in the face of ESM-based projects.