I am starting a new thread because the earlier one was auto-closed.
You wrote:
We’ve heard your concerns about the effects of some decisions and changes, and we’re actively working to address these issues
You also wrote (emphasis added by me):
As of today, partners have nearly 7 months before revenue share updates take effect on January 1. The updates were announced ahead of the usual 6 month window to give partners as much time as possible to choose the path that makes the most sense for them and complete any necessary development work.
I previously raised the issue about the Forge development delivery timeline not being in sync with other Atlassian business-level deadlines. This worry now also extends to the upcoming 5% (and soon to be 10%) revenue penalty that will be applied to Atlassian Connect apps.
Among other items in the “previously” link from above, I wrote this:
Vendors need time to build and test and deploy the changes required to work with new Atlassian implementations. If the deadline is 2026-12-31 but the final changes are shipped on 2026-12-30, vendors cannot turn that around on a dime.
While I was not hoping to be prescient in this matter, I received a notification today stating that a feature that my current Connect app currently uses, dynamic modules, just had its target ship date moved from 2025-09-30 to somewhere between 2025-12-01 and 2025-12-31. The Atlassian Connect penalty starts on 2026-01-01.
So, I do not have “nearly 7 months” to make my app work completely with Forge. Even assuming that no other portions of the features are delayed, I have somewhere between 1 and 30 days (of which a significant portion is swallowed by the holiday break). Past trends suggest that Atlassian is unlikely to publish the documentation until the feature is shipped, so I will also be shooting in the dark until then. (For example, will the feature even cover my existing use case? The existing RFC suggests a major architectural change from the Connect way of doing things, so even this part is unclear.)
To be blunt, this interval is insufficient for professional software development.
Has Atlassian really heard [our] concerns about the effects of these decisions? As I wrote in the “previously” link above, Atlassian is using an agile process for Forge development, but a waterfall process for business decisions (such as the pricing changes)…and these two are not working well together.
Is Atlassian even considering revising its decision to penalize Connect apps on January 1, or is this a “we heard you…but we are sticking to our guns”? If this is a foregone conclusion and vendors want to be able to adjust prices to try to avoid a revenue drop, we need to know right now. I am not sure if you are aware that it takes five months to fully push through a Marketplace app pricing change (pricing submitted today + 60 days grandfathering + 90 day quote duration).
In other words, if you want your app to be fully on the new pricing by the time this revenue change hits, new pricing needs to be submitted this Thursday.
I understand that Atlassian wants to move people to Forge. but penalizing vendors who cannot move to Forge (due to Atlassian’s moving delivery deadlines) is not the way.
If you are going to do this anyway, I am sure that vendors would appreciate a note saying something along the lines of: “we know that this is going to hurt some of you, but we need to enforce it anyway in order to move the ecosystem along, and we have our [KPIs/metrics/whatever] that we cannot meet unless we try to move everyone along [or whatever the driver might be], so it is a hard decision that is unfortunate but necessary”. Or maybe you are still working on some sort of response but you cannot write it out yet for internal/legal/whatever reasons. In this case, a “we are working on something and we hope to get back to you on 2025-yy-zz” is still better than nothing.
The alternative (continuing to repeat “we hear you”, but being otherwise silent in response) does not lead the reader to believe that the “we hear you” is particularly sincere, which makes me feel like the DFTC/!BS culture is continuing to fray from the point of view of the vendor.