RFC-94: Configurable Egress and Remotes

[SeanBourke]

Hey @remie,

That is not correct - the initial RFC noted that it would not be eligible under the current definition and given other research which is on-going to assess how configurable egress and REST APIs align to Runs on Atlassian, I preferenced to not include it in scope for discussion, so we could focus on use cases and the technical/approval implementation.

In later responses, we have clarified that this is still under exploration and that feedback is being considered.

@SeanBourke

This is still being explored - as noted, we are assessing the implication of this to other marketplace badges (such as Runs on Atlassian).

@SeanBourke

To everyone who has responded regarding Runs on Atlassian, we appreciate your feedback. We are continuing to discuss the implications of configurable remotes/egress against our marketplace programs and your inputs and feedback supports these conversations.

As noted in the original post, it is unlikely we’ll share a distinct position as part of this RFC, however we will share more details once they are available.