Hi @RomaBubyakin thanks for taking the time to send us your feedback. We have not planned to provide migration support for dynamic modules. We will certainly make relevant Forge documentation available when the feature becomes available.
As for the limitation - this is something we look into again as this seems to be a major concern.
The “Update” requirement is something we have considered and is in fact part of this RFC. We also felt this is a better experience than ‘delete and create’
Thanks for the feedback @alvaro.aranda - I am curious about the user data you are using to create project properties: would you require for this data to be DaRe compliant?
Helo Julia!
I was not mean to say we store user data in project properties but to store there the project data introduced manually by our customers.
@alvaro.aranda no you didn’t - it was just a curiosity of mine if you this is something you would expect
Hi Partner Community - since publishing this RFC our view on possible solution approaches for dynamic modules on Forge has evolved - also thanks to the feeback received which was very helpful. I will therefore close this RFC earlier than planned and publish a new one shortly for you to review.