Work is the new collective term for items tracked in Jira

We’ve always believed that Jira’s power has been its flexibility to represent all kinds of work; whether they be tasks, ideas, launches, stories, requests, bugs, or anything else.

Going forward, instead of referring to your work as ‘issues,’ Jira will call the different items you track exactly what they are: work.

Your feedback, questions, and suggestions are welcome to help ensure a smooth transition with these updates.

The issue with ‘issues’

When Jira started as a bug-tracking tool for software development a little over two decades ago, bugs were represented as ‘issues.’

Fast forward to today, thousands of functional teams of all types – software, marketing, IT, ops, HR, and more – use Jira daily to track work collaboratively. Yet for years, the way the work that teams track in Jira has continued to be represented as an 'issue.’

However, our customers have been clear that this terminology can be limiting and sometimes even confusing in the context of their work.

As part of this project, we conducted extensive research with existing Jira users, administrators, potential customers, and Marketplace partners. Along with analyzing data from our Chrome extension, we determined that “work” is a more suitable term than “issue” for representing the work of all types of teams.

What’s changing?

In our initial rollout, “issue” will be replaced by either “work” or “work item,” depending on the context:

  • Work is a broader, conceptual term that refers to all types of work within Jira.
  • Work item is used when referring to multiple objects of different types, for example on your Board, List, or other project views.

In future updates, we plan to incorporate the specific terminology you use for your unique work types. So, when you’re working on a particular type of task, the interface will dynamically adjust to reflect that context. For example, engineering teams see ‘bugs’ or 'stories,’ whereas Marketing teams may see ‘launches’ or 'copy.’

What in scope for our initial rollout?

As you might expect, replacing the term “issue” across the Atlassian ecosystem is a significant undertaking.

We’ve scoped and prioritized our milestones to ensure maximum customer value, while taking into account the time required for these changes. Our goal is to update the terminology on all UI surfaces used by 99% of Jira admins and users at the time of rollout, with the remaining instances being progressively updated afterward.

When is this update scheduled?

This update is scheduled to begin rolling out in March 2025. These terminology changes will be applied to all Jira Cloud products, including Jira, Jira Service Management, and Jira Product Discovery, as well as Jira Mobile, Confluence, Automation, and Loom.

How will this affect Jira Cloud APIs?

There are no changes to existing APIs; they will continue to function as usual with the term “issue.” This approach ensures that no backward-incompatible changes are introduced.

Please note that at release, there will be no updates to labels or descriptions in the documentation for existing APIs. However, we’re working on a plan to update this documentation at a later date.

Any new APIs introduced will begin using the terms “work” or “work item” rather than “issue.”

What is the impact on marketplace apps?

Apps on Atlassian Marketplace often enhance Jira’s functionality to meet specific customer needs and are typically seen as extensions rather than separate products.

For this reason, we recommend that partners audit their apps to identify areas where terminology may need updating. Understanding the scope of these changes is crucial to ensure a seamless transition when we roll out these updates.

We know that this can be time-consuming, but believe it will ultimately benefit the Marketplace ecosystem by attracting a broader range of teams into Jira.

There’s no requirement to update terminology before we begin rolling out, and we’ll provide additional guidance for Marketplace partners as we continue implementing these changes.

FAQs

Q1: Why not “item,” “record,” “activity,” “entity,” or “entry”?

While these are all valid options, our research indicated they can be ambiguous in what they represent. Our goal is to make Jira the place of work for all teams, and we believe work item is a natural replacement for ‘issue,’ as it more accurately captures a record of work, rather than just any activity.

Q2: Can admins decide what option to replace “issue” with? Will this be a site or a project-level setting?

No, admins won’t be able to choose what to replace “issue” with. By default, “issue” will be replaced with “work item” for all Jira customers at the site level.

Q3: Will this change come to Jira DC, too?

As of writing this answer, there are no concrete plans to bring this change to Jira DC anytime soon.

Q4: How can I see a preview of what this might look like in Jira?

You can try our Chrome extension and select “work item.” It’ll give you a preview of Jira with the refreshed terminology.

2 Likes

Please limit the introduction of new terminology to V4 of the REST API. For the GraphQL API, please come up with a good way to either version these changes or allow for both terms to be used until a set deprecation date.

Mixing both issue and work within a single API scheme would be a very big mistake.

12 Likes

Same question here about APIs: Will it then be “WorkItemTypes” or will “IssueTypes” still be a thing? Pleas provide more docs on this topic, thanks.

1 Like

Thanks for the feedback, we will consider the we version suggestion. We are not planning to combine issue and work in single API.

As mentioned in the blog, we are not planning to change any existing APIs so “IssueTypes” so these terminologies will remain across APIs

1 Like

From a Marketplace Partner perspective, at least for the REST API, I would say that we consider the entire version a single API. So for Jira, there is the V2 and V3 REST API. It would be very cumbersome for us if the work terminology would show up in either of these versions.

It would be better for Atlassian to introduce work in V4 of the REST API, and replace every instance of issue with work.

This will allow marketplace partners to continue to use the V3 with issue (pun intended) and plan their migration to V4 accordingly.

For example, Atlassian might want to add a new API /rest/api/3/work/{workIdOrKey} and deprecate the existing /rest/api/3/issue/{issueIdOrKey} endpoint in the V3 REST API. Because you are doing iteratively, other endpoints like /rest/api/3/issue/{issueIdOrKey}/transitions will still continue to exist.

Technically, this matches the statement of We are not planning to combine issue and work in single API., but in reality it means that marketplace partners will now have a combination of issue and work APIs in their code.

So my question to Atlassian is: please do not introduce new APIs that have work in the V3, and only start doing this in V4

11 Likes

It’s going to to be confusing in Jira dev doc (e.g. https://developer.atlassian.com/ etc.), especially for newcomers. Old doc would keep “issues”, new doc would be about “works”, maybe even mixing the terms in the same document when writing about APIs, …

1 Like

Could you provide more details on the research methodology and findings that led to this conclusion? I’m a UX designer working on Jira-related apps, so I’m especially curious.

5 Likes

It’s interesting to see the introduction of the term Work for Jira Cloud and how it is expected to extend across the entire ecosystem.

But how will this play out for customers using both Jira Cloud and Jira Data Center?
Will they have to juggle two different terms for the same concept?

This could also add complexity for development teams and hybrid apps, which would then have to adapt to these differences between environments.

5 Likes

My experience with Atlassian’s past renaming efforts— from “plug-ins” to “add-ons” and then to “apps”— is that many people stick with the term they learned first, and it’s quite difficult to update their memory. So, I think it will take a while for the old term to stop being used.

In terms of public-facing documentation, my guess is that Atlassian will update only the latest version of Cloud documentation. The historical knowledge, Data Center documentation, knowledge base articles, Atlassian Community, and Jira issues for bugs and suggestions will likely continue using the term “issue.”

This means searches will need to include “work,” “work item,” and “issue” to cover all relevant content. This could impact how effectively customers and consultants navigate information to find solutions.

7 Likes

Thanks for the prompt feedback @remie , we will consider your suggestion.

Hi @OndejMedek , thanks for reaching out. We’re working on updating our dev docs, but you will see both terms while we make this transition.

1 Like

Hi @Piotrmiaek , thanks for reaching out. We’ve been talking to customers about the possibility of this change for years now. Most recently we interviewed 86 participants from software to business Jira end users and admins, and non-Jira users. From our research we found ‘work’ resonated most.

We also noticed most people use their own language to describe the objects tracked in Jira. That might be a task, a ticket, or a bug. This is why we’re working on using work type language instead of the collective noun of ‘work’, where it makes sense to.

1 Like

Hi @FabienPenchenat , thanks for reaching out. You’re right our Jira Cloud and Jira Data Center customers will see both terms. But from our research, we found that most of our customers use their own language to describe the objects tracked in Jira anyway.

Hey @aioceva , thanks for reaching out. That’s exactly what we learnt from our research. People will use the language that resonates most with them, and we’re ok with that. We believe the power of Jira is that it caters to a diverse range of work.

We plan to update our Jira Cloud documentation and some Knowledge Base articles first. We won’t be updating Atlassian Community, as articles are time stamped, but we will start using ‘work item’ in new articles.

1 Like

No offence, but I really love how Atlassian considers 86 participants to be representative for your 300.000 customers and millions of users. I guess firing the Atlassian research department also included firing the statisticians :joy:

2 Likes

Thank you for your response. Earlier, you also mentioned quantitative analysis—could you share more details on how data collection through the Chrome extension was conducted? I assume you have an internal report from these studies—would it be possible to create a more detailed version that you could share with the community ? :slight_smile:

I’m simply curious if you could share any analytical data with vendors to help us create a better user experience.

@remie This was only the most recent study. The decision was informed by numerous studies we’ve run, alongside historical data and quantitative feedback over many years.

1 Like

@AdarshSinghMaheshwar sure. I turned it into a bit of fun, because frankly, the truth is that it is absolutely heartbreaking that Atlassian can’t even muster the decency to provide Marketplace Partners with a good story on why we should even bother to implement these changes. From a stakeholder management perspective, this is just underwhelming.

You are asking us to do busy work and spent time refactoring our code instead of working on delivering value to our mutual customers. Surely it isn’t too much to ask for Atlassian to spent some time explaining how it got to this decision.

Anyway, if Atlassian wants some tips on proper stakeholder management, I can recommend this great guide: What is Stakeholder Management? The Ultimate Guide from this company that apparently knows a thing or two about how others should do stakeholder management.

3 Likes

Hi team, we have some operational questions, so we can plan our work to align with the changes:

  1. Where it says, “the interface will dynamically adjust to reflect that context” — Is this based on business titles, project type, a custom field, or something else?
  2. Can Atlassian share a more details around its roll-out milestones? We see it’s starting in March 2025. When does Atlassian expect to reach their goal of 99% of UI surfaces being updated?
  3. Will updates go live within all Cloud products mentioned at the same time? If not, is there a prioritization order by product (e.g. Jira, JSM, Confluence, etc.) and if so, what is the order?
  4. Will Atlassian update its customer-facing materials (e.g. website, social) in March as well, or if not, what’s the timeline?
  5. The link to the Chrome extension in FAQ #4 isn’t working. Could this please be updated so we can see this in action?

Thank you,
Holly Wright
Appfire Marketplace Success

1 Like